Tag Archives: For-profit

Mr. Smith Goes to Washington

I had the great honor this week to be asked by the Department of Education’s National Center for Education Statistics to participate in their technical review panel to develop an alternate measure of income for for-profit colleges and non-degree certificate programs at community colleges who fail the department’s Gainful Employment Eligibility criterion. I felt like […]

Comments Off Continue Reading →

Killing Corinthian: Now What?

I don’t wish to rehearse the news about what has happened to Corinthian since it has been well reported in multiple outlets. (Click here, here, and here for more information.) Here’s my question: Corinthian has about 75,000 students and about 27,000 of them are in California. The students have been getting about $1.4 billion in […]

Comments Off Continue Reading →

The Small Liberal Arts, and Not-So-Liberal Arts, College: RIP

A conundrum exists in postsecondary enrollment. I have written repeatedly that we need more students participating in the postsecondary sector. At the same time, most of public higher education seems reluctant to consider alternative models of offering degrees that would be cheaper and of consequence likely involve fewer tenure-track faculty. The bloom is certainly off […]

Comments Off Continue Reading →

A Research Agenda for For-Profit Colleges and Universities

At first glance, the topic of a research agenda for for-profit institutions may seem to be a rather narrow, technical issue, of concern largely to those closely affiliated with those institutions—at most, some of those who work in them, who regulate them, who study them, and maybe even some of those who take courses in […]

Comments Off Continue Reading →

Student Debt: Pay It Forward

Oregon has come up with a plan that other states are considering; at one point, the plan was basically the framework Australia utilized when I had my Fulbright there. Curiously, Australia in the meantime has moved toward a more capitalist framework. Although the problem of student aid and student debt is complex, some have said that […]

2 Comments Continue Reading →

Just What is College? Descriptions from Old Media

Recent days have been laden with all kinds of news items that challenge our notion of what college is. Take the news from the California legislature’s introduction of a bill that would require state-sponsored colleges and universities to accept credits from MOOCs and other alternative low-priced avenues of education. Burke Smith, the founder of Straighterline.com […]

Comments Off Continue Reading →

Who’s on First?

There is a classic Abbott and Costello skit called “Who’s on first?” where Costello gets befuddled by the names of his friend’s team. We are close to getting into that situation without half as much humor in academe in terms of academic offerings. Not so long ago if someone wanted a bachelor’s degree we would […]

Comments Off Continue Reading →

AERA 2013: Painting the Town “For-Profit”

For-profit colleges and universities, whether we find them to be friend or foe, are now deeply woven into the fabric of U.S. higher education and society overall. As the 2013 American Educational Research Association Conference in San Francisco draws near, I am particularly excited about sessions that explore for-profit higher education and the changing nature […]

Comments Off Continue Reading →

The Critical Dialogue on MOOCs as Disruptive Innovation—or Not?

Yesterday we left off having discussed two disruptive criteria. Today, we will continue with four other criteria. Let’s rejoin Ms. Interviewer and Mario … Ms. Interviewer: Mario, welcome back. Let’s continue. Here is a question that captures the third criterion: Is/was the disruptive innovation produced outside the established value network of traditional colleges and universities? […]

Comments Off Continue Reading →

The MOOCs Dialogue

Clayton Christensen’s examples of disruptive innovations in the private sector show they are usually brought to market by new organizations that, well, disrupt the market. Both these characteristics fit well with breakthrough business model innovation on the adapted Tucker framework I have been discussing. So, in this sense, disruptive innovation is not a framework in […]

Comments Off Continue Reading →